• spiffmeister@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m not convinced that increasing dingo numbers wouldn’t at least help control the population. Basically all predator-prey systems go though cycles afaik (we teach this model to first year maths students). Obviously I’d have to read more to form a stronger opinion though.

    In fact, for those of us who eat meat, we should avoid beef, lamb, and pork. Kangaroo is FAR more sustainable from an environmental perspective…
    … even if Skippy is on our National Coat of Arms.

    This I agree with, I live overseas now and I miss a good roo-steak.

    • Fuse Views@infosec.exchange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      @spiffmeister

      Oh, increasing the dingo population (by any method) would, as you say, definitely impact the roo population. No question!

      But the *location* of that roo population matters and affects whether any cull makes economic sense.

      I was a spotter and offsider for a few pro roo shooters over a few seasons.

      Culling roos usually only makes sense when it benefits the farmer AND value can be extracted from the roos.

      Most culls I’ve seen were in cattle country that was still ‘close to town’, usually within 1-2 hrs’ drive. (I’m sure that culls also occur down in sheep country, too.)

      Primary producers rarely look upon dingos favourably, and there’d be little support for increasing them.

      The ‘predator-prey’ ‘boom/bust’ cycles are still common, but generally where the station’s size is measured in 1000’s of sq. kms. In the ‘back of beyond’, diesel alone costs much more than can be made from any culled roos.

      Edit: check out the dingo fence…
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingo/_Fence