@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.comexternal-linkmessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down115cross-posted to: webdev@programming.devtechnology@beehaw.orgfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.42Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.com@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: webdev@programming.devtechnology@beehaw.orgfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-square@jumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agowhy did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer? It’s always the profits!!!
minus-square@Brahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoI get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it. Edit: site, not sight
minus-square@Eranziel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThey’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
minus-square@jumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
why did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer?
It’s always the profits!!!
I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.
Edit: site, not sight
They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
I want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING