Just like this “bubble” has supposedly been about to pop for years.

True, but their votes also make no difference in the grand scheme of things. The only thing that does make a difference is if your boss is the CEO of a big company that donates to politicians. But you can’t counter that.

That you’d bring up the minimum wage argument kind of shows exactly what I was talking about. Most people think this is remotely relevant and keep bringing it up as an argument when all it does is show how little they know of how economy works. This is the kind of people that got Trump in office, no thinking, just parrotting what feels good to say because they’d like it to be true.

The problem with that like I said is your opinions and beliefs become really shallow and you pretty much just swallow whatever you feel like believing. To actually make sense of politics takes a whole lot of time, though most people, even on lemmy, actually know really little of it. However everyone on this platform is super confident in their opinion, though they don’t seem to able to debate it at all.

This was the big issue with direct democracies. You can help the problem a bit with representative democracies or republics, but you still have people taking a few minutes or sometimes hours every couple years to vote for the one that sounds better to your ears. This is how you get someone like Trump as president. People can’t really be trusted with any decisions about something they know nothing about.

One person changes nothing anyway. What would my vote change in a 80% conservative region? I’d rather spend that time on things I enjoy.

*Bit of a different situation in the US, but the US isn’t the entire world.

You do realize most people can’t really afford to care about politics right? When you’ve got people to care for, a job to work, a house to maintain, hobbies to participate in to keep a sane mind, how much time do you really have to spend on politics? Because whatever amount that is, it’s not enough. All sides spend a huge amount on propaganda and to see through all that takes more effort than normal people can spare.

Besides, there are far more important things you could focus on other than politics. That might depend on where you live and how old you are, but most people out there just don’t see the effect of politics beyond the occasional headline and higher taxes/inflation. Why not then spend the time you would spend on politics doing something that has an actual impact?

This is lemmy, balanced takes are not allowed.

Perhaps I should have specified a good faith argument.

You don’t argue for others, you argue for you.

Too many people these days, on this platform but also many others, have unchallenged opinions. They copy the opinion of their peers, and they make sense because these peers only give you arguments in its favor. People also tend to believe in what they want to believe.

Arguing helps you question those beliefs. Because to have a good arguments, you gotta bring points, but because the person you’re arguing with won’t just blindly believe in that opinion you’ll have to defend them.

I know this isn’t a popular opinion on Lemmy and similar potent echo chambers, but perhaps for your own good and nobody else’s, try and have an argument.

Lemmy has, the public has not.

Does it matter what year I used initially? It was a quick guess, and the context should have made that clear. I always go with 2023 because this is the year most people decided LLMs were dumb (rightfully so) and didn’t try them since.

Honestly, last year was still early, it had just begun to start thinking. LLMs only really got good ~6 months ago. With the current frontier though, not happening.

In 2023 maybe. These days, it’s not happening, terminal use is baked into their training, they do not search for it. The training quality is high enough that there’s no chance this goes through either. In reality, this is just hurting the beginners that will actually believe it.

Perhaps it could trick eg. google search’s builtin one though, but I don’t think anyone trusts it anyway.

On *them, but I think you knew that.

What a dumb comment. How am I wasting time if it saves time? Adding a small 5% overhead script to be able to save 90% of the original task’s time is not wasting time. Besides, you’re already using pydantic and structured json output anyway so half the veritication is free.

That’s on you, when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards, it’s basic common sense. And if a script can’t do it then human, if you’re saving 90% of the time instead of 100% it’s still fine.

I’m not sure what your point is. Garbage in garbage out, that’s just the law of computers. That would br the pilot’s mistake.

That’s dumb. The “work” in maintaining this excel file was the prompting and overall agent logic. In reality you’d be using something like openrouter and the instant claude “dies” for whatever reason you swap to whatever the freshest AI is. This never becomes ancient, it keeps up with the times.

Probably because of the extra butter, because man you probably killed someone’s pan with that comment.

Saves input tokens and uses more output because of OCR, and output is priced way higher.

Or so people have been saying for the past 3 years.

Probably cause it’s a dumb comment, you people see conspiracies everywhere.