Yeah, really low quality trolling.

So you are really unable to even counter a single point?

Really, go back to learn how to troll because you are really not good at it. Come back when you’re less boring.

There’s no point, you’re loving to defend rapists and your only way to try to feel like you’re right is to spam, enjoy your delusion and the world you’ve created, and keep up the mental gymnastics to avoid the cognitive dissonance.

Are you from 4chan by any chance? Nevermind, I don’t want to know.

If you side with the other guy, then I’m innocent until proven guilty.

Moronic trolls don’t even know how to be coherent anymore, it’s really pathetic.

People need to start hanging the church*

Here, I fixed it

Yeah I don’t know why I even bothered giving you attention

Ah, you’re one of those team-rapist that consider that it’s more common for victims to lie about getting raped, than not? That it’s fun to say to the world “hey I’ve been sexually abused and treated like a worthless crap”, while knowing that it’s very unlikely that anything will ever happen to the culprit? That’s pathetic.

If people accuse me of rape, I’m going to address it. And then you can form your opinion, just like with everything else. This is not. A. Court. You have the right to have a brain on your own, even though you visibly don’t use that right.

On top of that, you didn’t even just say “accused” but “credibly accused”, which means with a relatively good level of credibility. If in a case like that, you decide to still believe that the victims are lying, I’m sorry but you are part of the group of pieces of shit that defend, support and ultimately protect rapists. You decide to say “I will ignore all evidence, and believe a rapist until the victim manages to prove the rape legally, which is in most cases impossible”.

You sound like a very nice and likeable person.

What are you even trying to say?

Are you really implying that ideals should overcome justice, even when those ideals have been proven many times to not work?

Are you really saying that rape victims are able to get believed through the legal system, and that rapists get punished?

Keep on defending rape bro.

Are you a judge or a lawyer? Or even, a newspaper?

If not, then why do you have to follow a legal safeguard?

Why are people not saying that Trump is allegedly doing bad stuff, he hasn’t been formally condemned, so innocent until proven guilty?

If it’s not about defending rapists, then why is it that people only say that when it protects rapists and the like, but not for other criminal activities?

And last but not least, saying innocent until proven guilty about a rapist, is prematurely judging that the victims are lying. So you’re deciding to trust someone, and you’re trusting the one accused of rape rather than the victims.

But thanks for proving my point.

Yeah, that’s why as soon as someone gets accused of rape, if you dare say that they’re a piece of shit you get a ton of “innocent until proven guilty”

Even on lemmy, people keep on defending rapists. When I dared to complain about the term “allegedly raped” about the son of the princess of whatever that was good friends with epstein who had fucking literal videos that he took of the rape, people started defending it by saying that he’s innocent until proven guilty. Inescapable evidence? Believing the many, many victims that reported him? No, let’s instead pretend that we are in a court of law so that we can support the rapists.

Most men are definitely not against rape. I’m not sure that most people are, in general. They might be superficially against the idea, but practically speaking they don’t want to disturb the social status quo that protects rapists by pretending that rape victims are liars.

I mean, if you have a royal family, you’re asking for this shit

I mean, when you see most programmers, you want to believe it :)

The question is more “considering the state of the world and the reality of computer programming job, should I consider becoming programmer” and the answer is no.

This is absurd.

This is like saying that if nazi propaganda becomes the main selling point of web browsers, then firefox should add it just to stay relevant.

The advantage of firefox is (was) that it takes a stance instead of blindly following market trends. Following AI, no matter how immoral and damaging it is, just to avoid a hypothetical loss, is absolute bullshit.

They are doing it because they lost the will to take a stance, and this is what is killing them. Straying away from the opensouce, privacy centric stance is costing them their user base, and people who weren’t wanting such a stance are not going to move away from their usual browser with AI and whatever.

It’s exactly the thing that leftist parties do when they try to appeal to the nazis, they just get buried in their own stupidity.

Why do you think firefox-based browsers are getting more and more popular? It’s because they bring back firefox where it should be, because no one with enough brain to want to use firefox, wants a firefox with data collection and AI slop.

Unless it becomes very illegal to make hostile bots (which will never happen), the internet will be something only accessible through IDs and biometrics.

Hell, if you will.

1. Ask what was the purpose of the code
2. Delete all the slop crap
3. Make the code from scratch

It’s not just the comics, the news communities are also suddenly getting a surge of articles with fascist undertones (if not full-on fascist tones) that weirdly get a lot of support. I noticed for example that suddenly there’s a lot of articles talking positively of France, even though it is going extremely fast into fascism and has a president directly supporting nazis. A few months ago this would have never worked.

The only places where this doesn’t happen are the less popular communities, which also seems coherent with a bot attack.

I mean both. But while I understand that there is for now not a lot of alternatives for web scripting, there is a lot of backend languages which makes backend javascript even worse.

Anything else, basically. There’s not a lot of languages that are currently used and much worse.

My preference would lean towards something like Nim, probably, but I’m definitely not the best one to answer that. But javascript and its whole ecosystem is rotten (I mean, that’s sort of the reason the article exists here) and it is just not fit to make anything. The fact that people even bring javascript as the backend is a bit crazy to me.

I mean, it’s good, but what needs to be replaced is javascript.