That being said: if you actually want to have a discussion about this
Why is a discussion necessary? The facts are there.
It’s like global warming: at some point all you can do is be angry about it and keep pointing at reality.
That being said: if you actually want to have a discussion about this
Why is a discussion necessary? The facts are there.
It’s like global warming: at some point all you can do is be angry about it and keep pointing at reality.
I think I spent the entire time reading it with my mouth wide open.
As a procession of cute cartoon animals jumped in. “Eat me!!!”
No being within conditioned existence escapes ageing, sickness, and death. Being slaughtered for meat is probably not anyone’s preference, but all beings will die.
When people live, it’s expensive; when they die, it’s cheap.
We need to invent shame paint balls that cause the person hit to reassess their lack of compassion for other living beings.
I’m just exhausted at this point. Nothing he does phases me anymore.
Yup. There’s no point caring, he’s a broken record of hatred. Just move on.
Pseudo meat is a way to help people who miss meat to eat less of it. It’s not a necessary feature of a non-meat diet.
Just destroy the internet and/or the planet when Lemmy becomes reddit and the changeover will never happen.
It’s a common talking point amongst those who have a murderous hatred of vegans.
Personally, I don’t want to be part of a human society which purposefully creates huge amounts of suffering for animals (including human animals). Yet, here we are.
All ace’s are hot. The fun part is we don’t want to have sex with NOT_RICK because we’re ace. That’s the part of their post to disagree with, they don’t know from experience.
Humans had their chance.
Computer generated imagery could in theory be helpful, so the itch gets scratched
The Freudian concept of catharsis has been debunked many, many times. Does rape go down when freely available internet porn go up? That’s a rhetorical question, goodbye.
I don’t recall Nabokov’s novel Lolita saying that sexualising minors was an acceptable act.
Thanks for the strawman, though, I’ll save it to burn in the colder months.
…we should be striving for less damage to the patient, too.
Can you make someone just not sexually interested in something they find arousing? As far as I know, conversion therapy for non-heterosexual people doesn’t have good success rates. Also, those therapies also tended to involve some form of harm, from what I’ve heard.
If you want to keep people who fantasise about sexually exploiting children around your family, be my guest. My family tried that, and I was raped. I didn’t like that, and I have drawn my own conclusions.
Looking at your replies in that thread, I suspect that your comment did break rules.
The lack of evidence here is my evidence.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
It’s not my problem that humans don’t tend to care about facts. They’re allowed to kill themselves.
You’re assuming that I am desperate for people to listen to the truth. This is not so. If people prefer lies, that’s fine.