• 7 Posts
  • 223 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle


  • Phen@lemmy.eco.brtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devTeams
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your point is actually what makes remote work so much more effective. When you work in an office, you get used to things working by chance - people seeing what others are doing, talking about it on coffee breaks and so on. When everybody is working remotely, you quickly realize that those things that happened by chance were actually a lot more important than it might seem at first - and then you can do the dumb thing and go back to having it happen by chance, or you can change your processes to ensure that everyone who may have anything to say about what you’re doing, know that you’re doing it.










  • At one point long ago (just for a short while), I thought Delphi was destined to take that place. It was much higher level while still letting you go as low level as you wanted- it didn’t have garbage collection but it made it pretty easy to keep track of what is or isn’t allocated, on top of having good tools to find leaks on runtime. But it had too many problems too: the Pascal base and the association with drag and drop coders being some of the first ones, followed by a series of bad decisions by whatever company was responsible for it at any given week.






  • Audio communication is too slow. If Humans can’t evolve to communicate telepathically, language itself should evolve to account for this. Here’s what I propose:

    • we develop a mathematical formula to generate a fingerprint/signature for sentences we intent to say;
    • before saying anything, we calculate this fingerprint in our head, then say this fingerprint result, followed by the actual thing we want to say
    • the listener then gets this fingerprint result and keeps in mind; whenever it tries to predict what the full sentence from the speaker is going to be, it calculates the fingerprint for the predicted sentence and compares it to the fingerprint received at the start.
    • if the fingerprints match, then the listener reports: “I got it” and the speaker can then skip saying the rest of their sentence.

    Surely this is bound to improve communication for everyone and would have no downsides whatsoever.

    (Sorry, the amphetamines must be kicking in right about now).


  • I somehow managed to get pretty good at getting a good feeling of “did this person understood what I want them to understand?” and I adapt my level of overexplaining based on that feeling.

    It’s something I wish other people did to me as well, as I hate it when people keep talking more to make the same point I already got. Tbh sometimes I even wish people would stop mid-sentence if I already autocompleted their sentence in my head.