Also, how can you be aged 16 and below? I know, not technically the software’s fault, but still…

  • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems very clear. All ages including 16 YOA and those below 16 YOA. It seems stupid to have to list every age just for the 1% of English speaking people who can’t comprehend English.

    • dave@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your child can’t be both 16 and below. It’s understandable but wrong. If they’d written it in the form “All children 16 and below …” it would have been ok.

      But still, how do you answer it for a 17-year-old?

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        “16 and below” is a completely normal phrasing.

        I’m only concerned about no option being there for, you know, kids above 16 :D